Viewing William Gibson’s ‘Neuromancer’ Through the Lens of Trans-humanism and Post-humanism

Authors

  • Dr. Shilpi Bhattacharya Professor, Department of English, Kalinga University, Naya Raipur, Raipur(C.G.)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59367/3qer4b33

Keywords:

Identity, Post-humanism, Science Fiction, Technology, Trans-humanism

Abstract

The present paper explores the themes of trans-humanism and post-humanism in the seminal work of science fiction, that is "Neuromancer" by William Gibson. Trans-humanism and post-humanism are concepts that explore the potential evolution of humanity beyond its current biological limitations and often revolves around the themes of technology, consciousness, and identity. In "Neuromancer" by William Gibson, these concepts are central to the narratives, offering different perspectives on the implications of merging human cognition with technology and the eventual transcendence of human existence. A close examination of this work would help to bring forth two different perspectives to envision the evolution of humanity in the context of rapid technological advancement. "Neuromancer" by William Gibson offer contrasting visions of the future of humanity in the age of accelerating technological progress. While this novel explores themes of trans-humanism and post-humanism, it do so in distinct ways. Gibson focusses on the dystopian implications of merging human consciousness with technology. While portraying the dystopian vision, Gibson seamlessly merges humans with cyberspace, blurring the lines between physical and virtual realities. Throughout the novel, Gibson explores the consequences of a society where technology has become deeply ingrained in every aspect of life, from commerce to personal identity. By analysing the narratives, characters and speculative worlds created by Gibson, this paper seeks to uncover the implications of trans-humanist and post-humanist ideas for society, identity, and the human condition.

 

References

Crighton, A. (2010). Among the Spirits of Cyberspace: An Analysis of Shamanic Motifs in Neuromancer. In Merger and Embodiment (pp. 197–209). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848880184_017

Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2019). Castells’ Network Concept and Its Connections to Social, Economic and Political Network Analyses. Journal of Social Structure, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21307/joss-2019-021

Dayal, G. (2012). William Gibson on Why Sci-Fi Writers Are (Thankfully) Almost Always Wrong. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/09/interview-with-william-gibson/

Haraway, D. (1987). A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980’s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538

Bould, M. (2010). Affect and Artificiality: Assembling the Posthuman in Gibson's Neuromancer. Science Fiction Studies, 37(3), 463-482.

Hayles, N. K. (2000). Virtual Bodies and Flickering Signifiers. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The Cybercultures Reader (pp. 321-335). Routledge.

Landon, B. (1989). Gibson, Neuromancer, and the Postmodern Archetype. Science Fiction Studies, 16(2), 209-217.

Penrose, D. (2006). Between Man and Machine: Posthumanism and the Cyborg in Gibson's Neuromancer and Scott's Blade Runner. The Yearbook of English Studies, 36(2), 116-132.

Ziarek, E. P. (1991). Gibson's Neuromancer: Cyborg Worlds and Human Subjects. SubStance, 20(3), 104-116.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Viewing William Gibson’s ‘Neuromancer’ Through the Lens of Trans-humanism and Post-humanism . (2024). International Journal of Futuristic Innovation in Arts, Humanities and Management (IJFIAHM), 3(1), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.59367/3qer4b33

Similar Articles

11-20 of 83

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.